2003 Ford Econovan vs. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2003 Ford Econovan is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Chevrolet Camaro (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 150 kg more than 2003 Ford Econovan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Chevrolet Camaro (291 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econovan. (139 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1981 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Econovan | 1981 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Econovan | Camaro |
Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 4375 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 291 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2760 mm |