2003 Ford Econovan vs. 1997 Mitsubishi Space Wagon
To start off, 2003 Ford Econovan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mitsubishi Space Wagon would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mitsubishi Space Wagon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mitsubishi Space Wagon (131 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mitsubishi Space Wagon should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econovan.
Because 2003 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mitsubishi Space Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mitsubishi Space Wagon (176 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econovan. (139 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1997 Mitsubishi Space Wagon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Econovan | 1997 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Econovan | Space Wagon |
Year Released | 2003 | 1997 |
Body Type | Van | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2730 mm |