2003 Ford Econovan vs. 2008 Opel Zafira
To start off, 2008 Opel Zafira is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Opel Zafira is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econovan weights approximately 65 kg more than 2008 Opel Zafira.
Because 2003 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Opel Zafira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Opel Zafira (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econovan. (139 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Opel Zafira will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Econovan | 2008 Opel Zafira | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Econovan | Zafira |
Year Released | 2003 | 2008 |
Body Type | Van | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2700 mm |