2003 Ford Econovan vs. 2010 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2010 Toyota Camry is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Camry (268 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Camry weights approximately 275 kg more than 2003 Ford Econovan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Camry (336 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econovan. (139 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econovan. 2010 Toyota Camry has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Econovan has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Econovan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Toyota Camry will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Econovan | 2010 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Econovan | Camry |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4806 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2776 mm |