2003 Ford Econovan vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econovan weights approximately 80 kg more than 2011 Renault Clio.
Because 2003 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Renault Clio (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econovan. (139 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econovan. 2011 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Econovan has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Econovan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Econovan | 2011 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Econovan | Clio |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2580 mm |