2003 Ford Econovan vs. 2012 Renault Twizy
To start off, 2012 Renault Twizy is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econovan would be higher. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Econovan (90 HP) has 69 more horse power than 2012 Renault Twizy. (21 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Twizy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econovan weights approximately 845 kg more than 2012 Renault Twizy. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Econovan | 2012 Renault Twizy | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Econovan | Twizy |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 21 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 2320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1190 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1460 mm |
