2003 Ford Ecosport vs. 1978 Chrysler 1609
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 1609. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 1609.
Because 2003 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Chrysler 1609. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ecosport | 1978 Chrysler 1609 | |
| Make | Ford | Chrysler |
| Model | Ecosport | 1609 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 1639 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4228 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1679 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2670 mm |
