2003 Ford Excursion vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass

To start off, 2003 Ford Excursion is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Excursion weights approximately 1600 kg more than 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Because 2003 Ford Excursion is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Excursion will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford Excursion 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Make Ford Oldsmobile
Model Excursion Cutlass
Year Released 2003 1969
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5407 cc 5736 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 252 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Weight 3210 kg 1610 kg
Vehicle Length 5760 mm 5280 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1960 mm
Vehicle Height 2050 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 3490 mm 2960 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]