2003 Ford Expedition vs. 1949 Riley RM A
To start off, 2003 Ford Expedition is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Riley RM A would be higher. At 4,603 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1125 kg more than 1949 Riley RM A.
Because 2003 Ford Expedition is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Expedition will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Expedition has automatic transmission and 1949 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1949 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Expedition will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Expedition | 1949 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Ford | Riley |
| Model | Expedition | RM A |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 4603 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2870 mm |
