2003 Ford Expedition vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 2003 Ford Expedition is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 4,603 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Expedition (238 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1345 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Expedition (397 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Expedition will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Expedition | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Expedition | 220 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4603 cc | 1776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 397 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2610 mm |
