2003 Ford Explorer vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2003 Ford Explorer is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Explorer (236 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Explorer weights approximately 1152 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Explorer (382 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Explorer | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Explorer | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 236 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 382 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2082 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2540 mm |
