2003 Ford F-150 vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2003 Ford F-150. (202 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford F-150 weights approximately 946 kg more than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2003 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford F-150 (338 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford F-150 | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | F-150 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1311 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2710 mm |