2003 Ford F-150 vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC90 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2003 Ford F-150. (202 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 85 kg more than 2003 Ford F-150. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Volvo XC90. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford F-150 (338 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo XC90. (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford F-150 | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | F-150 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 237 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 2160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4807 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1936 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1784 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2857 mm |
