2003 Ford F-250 vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2003 Ford F-250 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford F-250 (296 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford F-250 weights approximately 760 kg more than 1952 Talbot Baby. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford F-250 | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Ford | Talbot |
Model | F-250 | Baby |
Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 3130 mm |