2003 Ford F-250 vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2003 Ford F-250 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford F-250 (256 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1495 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Zastava 850 K. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford F-250 | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | F-250 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 5407 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2350 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2010 mm |
