2003 Ford F-250 vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2003 Ford F-250 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford F-250 (296 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1555 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford F-250 | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | F-250 | 850 K |
Year Released | 2003 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 846 cc |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2010 mm |