2003 Ford F-250 vs. 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2003 Ford F-250 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford F-250 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche.
Because 2003 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford F-250 | 1973 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | F-250 | Corniche |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1973 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5407 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2350 kg | 2280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 3030 mm |
