2003 Ford F-250 vs. 1990 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 2003 Ford F-250 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford F-250 (296 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1990 Jaguar XJ6. (200 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1990 Jaguar XJ6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford F-250 (495 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Jaguar XJ6. (299 Nm). This means 2003 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Jaguar XJ6.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford F-250 | 1990 Jaguar XJ6 | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | F-250 | XJ6 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1990 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 3239 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 299 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2880 mm |