2003 Ford F-250 vs. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500
To start off, 2003 Ford F-250 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford F-250 (495 Nm) has 400 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. (95 Nm). This means 2003 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford F-250 has manual transmission. 2003 Ford F-250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford F-250 | 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | F-250 | Mum 500 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 500 cc |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 495 Nm | 95 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |