2003 Ford F-250 vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade
To start off, both 2003 Ford F-250 and 2003 MCC Crossblade were released in the same year (2003). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford F-250 (296 HP) has 226 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1670 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford F-250 (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 393 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2003 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford F-250 | 2003 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | F-250 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2003 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 495 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 1810 mm |