2003 Ford F-250 vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi R8 (525 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 2003 Ford F-250. (296 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford F-250.
Because 2012 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford F-250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi R8 (530 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford F-250. (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2012 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford F-250.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford F-250 | 2012 Audi R8 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | F-250 | R8 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 525 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 530 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1245 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 144 L | 90 L |