2003 Ford F-250 vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford F-250 (256 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Because 2003 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford F-250 (474 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2003 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore. 2003 Ford F-250 has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford F-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford F-250 | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | F-250 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5407 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 474 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
