2003 Ford F-250 vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 61 more horse power than 2003 Ford F-250. (296 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford F-250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford F-250. (495 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford F-250.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford F-250 | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | F-250 | UTE |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 495 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |