2003 Ford Falcon vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2003 Ford Falcon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2001 Nissan MM. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan MM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 320 kg more than 2003 Ford Falcon.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Falcon. (357 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Falcon. 2001 Nissan MM has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan MM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Falcon | 2001 Nissan MM | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Falcon | MM |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 2956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 357 Nm | 372 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1835 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 1530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 106 L |