2003 Ford Fiesta vs. 1956 Packard Patrician
To start off, 2003 Ford Fiesta is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Packard Patrician. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Packard Patrician would be higher. At 5,767 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Packard Patrician is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Packard Patrician (271 HP) has 204 more horse power than 2003 Ford Fiesta. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Packard Patrician should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Fiesta.
Because 1956 Packard Patrician is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Packard Patrician. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Fiesta | 1956 Packard Patrician | |
| Make | Ford | Packard |
| Model | Fiesta | Patrician |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 5767 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 271 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3240 mm |
