2003 Ford Focus vs. 1986 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2003 Ford Focus is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,354 cc, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2003 Ford Focus. (73 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Focus.
Because 1986 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Focus. (125 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Focus.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Focus | 1986 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Focus | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1986 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1387 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2430 mm |