2003 Ford Freestar vs. 1992 Ford Tempo

To start off, 2003 Ford Freestar is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Freestar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Freestar (190 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (129 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Freestar should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Freestar weights approximately 745 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Freestar (336 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (204 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Freestar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo. 2003 Ford Freestar has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Tempo has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Tempo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Freestar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: