2003 Ford Freestar vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2003 Ford Freestar is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 3,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Freestar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Freestar (190 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. (175 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Freestar should accelerate faster than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Freestar weights approximately 470 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Freestar (336 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Freestar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Freestar | 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Freestar | Sigma |
Year Released | 2003 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3801 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 336 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1940 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2730 mm |