2003 Ford GT vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2003 Ford GT is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford GT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford GT weights approximately 945 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford GT (678 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 631 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford GT | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | GT | 600 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5409 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 493 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 678 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2010 mm |