2003 Ford GT vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2003 Ford GT is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford GT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford GT weights approximately 38 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford GT has manual transmission. 2003 Ford GT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford GT | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
| Model | GT | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5409 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 493 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1482 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2760 mm |
