2003 Ford Ka vs. 1949 Jaguar Mark IV
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 2,663 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Jaguar Mark IV is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jaguar Mark IV weights approximately 788 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka.
Because 1949 Jaguar Mark IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Jaguar Mark IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ka | 1949 Jaguar Mark IV | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Ka | Mark IV |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 69 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 962 kg | 1750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 63 L |
