2003 Ford Ka vs. 1949 Jeep CJ2A
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ka (94 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 204 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1949 Jeep CJ2A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (135 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1949 Jeep CJ2A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ka | 1949 Jeep CJ2A | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Ka | CJ2A |
Year Released | 2003 | 1949 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 135 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 906 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2040 mm |