2003 Ford Ka vs. 1949 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,488 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Maserati A6G (64 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ka weights approximately 87 kg more than 1949 Maserati A6G.
Because 1949 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ka | 1949 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Ford | Maserati |
| Model | Ka | A6G |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 962 kg | 875 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2560 mm |
