2003 Ford Ka vs. 1953 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Talbot T 26 (197 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 648 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ka | 1953 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Ford | Talbot |
Model | Ka | T 26 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1953 |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 4482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 962 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1890 mm |