2003 Ford Ka vs. 1955 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ka (73 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1955 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1955 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 90 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka.
Because 1955 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ka | 1955 Isuzu Minx | |
| Make | Ford | Isuzu |
| Model | Ka | Minx |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1265 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2370 mm |
