2003 Ford Ka vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Nissan Cedric (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka.
Let's talk about torque, 1960 Nissan Cedric (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (99 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1960 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ka | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Ka | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 99 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2540 mm |
