2003 Ford Ka vs. 1962 Morgan 4
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,340 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Morgan 4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ka (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1962 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1962 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ka weights approximately 302 kg more than 1962 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ka | 1962 Morgan 4 | |
Make | Ford | Morgan |
Model | Ka | 4 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1340 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 962 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2450 mm |