2003 Ford Ka vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ka (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ka weights approximately 222 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ka | 1962 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Ka | 8 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 69 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 962 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2280 mm |
