2003 Ford Ka vs. 1964 Holden EK
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ka (69 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EK (160 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (106 Nm). This means 1964 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ka | 1964 Holden EK | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Ka | EK |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 69 HP | 65 HP |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1740 mm |
