2003 Ford Ka vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 328 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ka | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Ka | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 69 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 962 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2700 mm |
