2003 Ford Ka vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ka (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 358 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ka | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Ka | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 69 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 962 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2700 mm |
