2003 Ford Ka vs. 1970 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1970 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (73 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 70 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mazda Cosmo (134 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1970 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ka | 1970 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ka | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2003 | 1970 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2210 mm |