2003 Ford Ka vs. 1970 Seat 600

To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ka (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1970 Seat 600. (29 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1970 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ka weights approximately 352 kg more than 1970 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1970 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Ka (99 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications: