2003 Ford Ka vs. 1970 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. Both 2003 Ford Ka and 1970 Triumph Spitfire are equipped with a 1,294 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ka (73 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ka weights approximately 120 kg more than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Ka (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. (99 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ka | 1970 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Ka | Spitfire |
Year Released | 2003 | 1970 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 99 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2110 mm |