2003 Ford Ka vs. 1977 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ka weights approximately 12 kg more than 1977 Opel Ascona.
Because 1977 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ka | 1977 Opel Ascona | |
| Make | Ford | Opel |
| Model | Ka | Ascona |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 69 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 962 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2530 mm |
