2003 Ford Ka vs. 1982 Mazda 323
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ka (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ka weights approximately 112 kg more than 1982 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Ka (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 323. (80 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ka | 1982 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Ka | 323 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1071 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 69 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 80 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 962 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2370 mm |
