2003 Ford Ka vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ka weights approximately 152 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ka | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Ka | Colt |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1244 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 69 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 962 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2310 mm |
