2003 Ford Ka vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ka (73 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ka weights approximately 48 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ka | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ka | 9 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 167 km/hour | 138 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 38 L |