2003 Ford Ka vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Celica (119 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Celica weights approximately 218 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (99 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ka | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ka | Celica |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 99 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 962 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2640 mm |