2003 Ford Ka vs. 1984 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1984 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Mazda RX-7 (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (94 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka.
Because 1984 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Mazda RX-7 (158 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (135 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1984 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ka | 1984 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ka | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1984 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2430 mm |